Compensation Duration, Shareholder Governance, and Managerial Short-Termism∗
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper, I investigate the interaction between the duration of executive compensation and shareholder governance. I show that short-term compensation can elicit shareholder intervention and thus enhance firm value. The central mechanism is that the use of short-term incentives enables informed incumbent shareholders to commit to using their private information to intervene (voice) instead of selling their shares (exit). Without a commitment to voice, incumbent shareholders might find, ex post, that exit is more appealing than voice if they privately observe that a firm’s type is bad. Short-term incentives encourage a good firm to take actions that reveal its type early on. This, in turn, reduces the information advantage of the incumbent shareholders and their ability to profit from exit. Effectively, short-term compensation serves as a commitment device for value-enhancing intervention.
منابع مشابه
The Effect of Activists’ Short-Termism on Corporate Governance
Does activist investors’ focus on short-term stock prices impede their role in improving corporate governance? This model builds on the notion that both the act of intervention and the threat of an intervention can generate value for the target firm. We demonstrate that an activist with short-termism intervenes excessively (insufficiently) when her ability to conduct a value-enhancing intervent...
متن کاملTo each according to her luck and power: Optimal corporate governance and compensation policy in a dynamic world
We model long-run firm performance, management compensation, and corporate governance in a dynamic, nonstationary world. We show that managerial compensation and governance policies, which, in a single-period context, can best be rationalized by self-serving managerial influence over board policy, are shareholder-wealth maximizing in a dynamic setting. For example, shareholder wealth is maximiz...
متن کاملInvestor Horizons and Corporate Policies
This paper looks at the effect of shareholder horizon on corporate behavior. In perfect capital markets, corporate behavior should be insensitive to shareholder horizon, but when investment opportunities are not well valued by the market, shareholder horizon matters. We first present a simple framework to show that shareholder horizon should be looked at in conjunction with stock misvaluation. ...
متن کاملImpact of compensation structure and managerial incentives on bank risk taking
In this article, we analyze the impact of managerial compensation structure in publicly-traded banks on their risk taking behavior described by the loans extended by them, and the changes in risk taking through the changing regulatory environment for these banks. We build a simulation model to study the impact of the interaction between regulatory changes and competitiveness in the sector on ma...
متن کاملBasel III and CEO compensation in banks : Pay structures as a regulatory signal
This paper proposes a new regulatory approach that implements capital requirements contingent on managerial compensation. We argue that excessive risk taking in the financial sector originates from the shareholder moral hazard created by government guarantees rather than from corporate governance failures within banks. The idea of the proposed regulation is to utilize the compensation scheme to...
متن کامل